Wednesday, June 3, 2009

What's up? Who wants to talk about sprots?

"Hey party people. Its about that time" - Black Moon

I've been away, doing the daddy thing, along with other stuff, which I will be writing about in the future. But anyway, I just had to quickly write about my experience as a father: It's the most unbelievable thing that I've done in my life. I never thought that I would be part of creating such a beautiful creature. She is the reason I put up with crap in the world nowadays. I would even watch hockey for my daughter. That being said...the game did markedly better ratings-wise than it has in the past where it seemed that the NHL literally had to pay people to watch the damn games.

Of course, this doesn't change anything in the grand scheme of the popularity of sports. It will never overtake MLB, the NBA or (lol) the NFL. Nothing beats the NFL. Its one of the 11 Commandments. The NHL has rabid, committed fans who wear mullets and make no bones about their favorite sport or hairstyle. Its about the best thing it has going for it.

"You're a jerk. Go to a game. Its the best". I have. Unfortunately. I went to see a Devils game a few years ago. I thought I stepped into a time machine with all those mullets (not a joke) and hairspray and makeup that the women were wearing was not attractive. I even saw acid wash. Sure it was the late 90's (I believe '99), but it was still not being worn at the time. I honestly sat there mouth agape staring at these people. I don't even remember what the score of the game was. The intermission is too damn long too. Its great if you're drinking a lot of beer and you have a wee little kidney and bladder combo, but if you just want to watch the game to its conclusion, its not too appealing. There are hits, yes. Without a doubt. So that is exciting. To me though, if the game ends in a tie after having to sit through loud Mark Knopfler songs, acid wash (yes, its a noun) and the smell of spilled Budweiser and Aquanet to get to a 1-1 tie. Its just too much for me to experience in one month. Let alone a 3 hour period. Wow, wouldn't life be great if periods were only 3 hours? Anyhoo...

Baseball

Baseball in New York is back, for the most part. The Mets and Yankees were in first place at the same time not too long ago. Since then however, the Mets are in the middle of an almost funny string of injuries. Not Carl Pavano funny (he pulled his butt), but they now think that Carlito Beltran could possibly have the Swine Flu ("La gripe de cerdo" for any Spanish-speaking readers). Despite the run of injuries, and this bodes very well for them, they're still sitting in 2nd place in the East with a record of 28 and 23 just 2.5 games behind of the Phils and +21 run differential. Maybe even worse than the injuries is that Livan Hernandez is your number 5 starter. You know what's worse though? That means that Tim Redding is your number FOUR starter. To be in second place right now is GREAT. Not sarcasm. That's saying something. The thing with their recent history though is that everyone has to hold their breath till the end of the season.

As for the Yankees, they're playing great right now. Yesterday Posada ended their, now all-time record of consecutive games without an error at 18. Now honestly, I don't think the record in and of itself THAT big a deal. Like, if I see someone with a t-shirt that speaks to this record i'll laugh at them and send them back to Jersey (pronounced, "Joisey"). What it does speak to is their defense overall has become significantly better. Has it been that long since the Yanks had a really good fielding 1st baseman? Man, I didn't realize we missed you so much Tino, and really, Donnie Baseball.

Basketball

Wow, im disappointed that Lebron didn' get to the Finals. He's the best player in the world right now. The worst part? This gives those that hate on LBJ (Ed?) ammo to say that Kobe is the best player in the NBA.

This should be an interesting Finals. While I still think that the Lakers will take it because of their advantage in OVERALL talent over the ENTIRE NBA, Orlando has some interesting talent. Or rather, their athletes are hard to defend. They have 2 players on the wing that are about 6'10" that can handle the rock and shoot the 3. If Gasol, Odom and Bynum are forced to play out on the perimeter leaving Dwight in the paint alone with WHOMEVER the Lakers leave on him, hes going to destroy them on the boards and on the scoreboard. It should be interesting.

Monday, December 24, 2007

Top Ten Albums Of "2007"

WASSUP! Let me be the first to wish Lucy, Catalina, Chloe, and Elian (all the new babies in our extended fam) a very happy first holiday season. I hope all the various holiday celebrations are safe and exciting for babies and parents alike.

As 2007 is quickly coming to a close, and I'm in the "Slower, Lower" (that's what the local folks call Delaware) with a little time on my hands, I wanted to drop a little gem on the posse and get your thoughts about the albums that made an impact on you this year. So I'd like us to compile a list of the Top Ten Albums of 2007, but with a twist. This list does not have to be albums that were released in 2007. I'm thinking more of albums that you just happened to find yourself indulging in during the course of the year. So, for example, if you just couldn't seem to stop listening to Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On", then by all means, drop it on the list. Odds are the majority of the albums will be from 2007 or near, but hey, why limit ourselves to such trivial confines. So without further ado, I will begin (in no particular order):


If you guys haven't copped this one yet, you need to. Perhaps one of the best efforts by the Wu in a long time. "8 Diagrams" boasts some of the tightest production quality Rza has ever achieved. With guests appearances by Erykah Badu, George Clinton and John Frusiante (guitarist from the Chili Peppers), the Wu add a lot of depth to their original Kung Fu formula. The whole clan is at their best (though, now that I think about it, Inspecta Deck is MIA) and there are numerous odes and tributes to their fallen comrade ODB. This is by far one of the best hip hop albums to drop this year (the others will be on the list). I can listen to it over and over and barely skip a song.

After 15 years in "The Game", it seems Common has taken a liking to the big screen. With roles in "Smoking Aces" and "American Gangster", he was good enough to land roles in the much anticipated 2008 release "Wanted" along side Angelina Jolie and Morgan Freeman, as well as a confirmed role as The Green Lantern in the the upcoming "Justice League of America". Its amazing he still has time to make an album. Yet this workaholic put forth not only one of the best hip hop albums of 2007, but arguably one of the best records of the year. An instant classic, "Finding Forever" solidifies Common as the resident conscience of today's crumbling morals of hip hop. Keep fighting the good fight, Common Sense.

For those that don't know, K-os has been around for a while. He has a style that is hard to confine to one specific genre, dancing around a solid hip hop foundation into rock, reggae, soul and funk influenced brilliance. And "Atlantis" keeps his proverbial ball rolling. From the Purple Rain-era crooning of "The Rain", to the Studio 54 style disco of "Black Ice" K-os (stands for Knowledge Of Self), shows he's just as comfortable freestyling lyrically as he is flexing his vocal range. One of the freshest, most original new artists to hit the music scene. Period.

Say what you want about this 50 pound throwback, the girl can blow (or is she just doing too much blow?). Though her album, "Back to Black" dropped in late 2006, her voice, as well as her album, has served as a virtual soundtrack for 2007. And considering all the celebs hitting the "Rehab" this year, its quite fitting. Check out her previous album "Frank" to really get a glimpse of her sense of humor and songwriting abilities, with jams like "Fuck Me Pumps" and "Stronger Than Me".

I'm still waiting for someone to drop a "Rock Music is Dead" album ala Nas, but perhaps it got shelved after someone heard the Chili Peppers latest double shot to the dome. Mixing the perfect blend of early Peppers hard funk with their more recent melodic charm, Flea and the boys show why they paved the way for the Linkin Parks and Incubus' of today's rock, but still set the bar. A two album set, "Stadium Arcadium" takes you on a sonic voyage through the raunchy romance that the Chili Peppers have created for two generations of fans.

There is not much to get excited about in the world of Pop Music, but JT shows why he's carrying the torch for some of the old greats of the genre. With his first effort, Justified, he did his best to channel our favorite train wreck Michael Jackson. With "Futuresex" he revels in the influence of His Purpleness himself, with a slew of sexually-charged bubblegum bangers. One of the best duos to hit the pop scene since Jackson and Jones (Quincy, if you're nasty), Timberland and Timberlake have once again combined to produce a fine, albeit candy-coated, pop music masterpiece. Perhaps next album, he'll get a bit more creative with the cover art.

Thom Yorke has been in hiatus for the last few years. Apparently he's been busy. Radiohead's newest album, "In Rainbows" is the band's best record, in my opinion. With haunting rhythms and fresh new melodies, Thom and his cronies craft a mystic blend of electronica and expression. But perhaps the most groundbreaking thing about this album is their marketing scheme. The band released the album exclusively on their website, for the price of, well, whatever you want. Fans only had to donate whatever they wanted to download the album, hopefully proving once and for all that free internet downloading is NOT the reason for poor album sales. Perhaps artists these days are just dropping a bunch of crap.

This lyrical monarch has been burning tracks since the early nineties with his group Organized Konfusion. And after a few solo releases that never quite blew up, "Desire" has finally raised Monch up from the subterranean backpack scene. By far my favorite performer at this summer's hiphopapalloza "Rock the Bells", Pharoahe Monch has constructed a complicated labyrinth of storytelling, bravado and ear-blazing tracks that challenge the hip hop norms while staying true to his brain-teasing lyrical tongue lashings. With probably one of the first hip hop epics, his nearly 10 minute "Trilogy" shows R. Kelly that he needs to keep his Cradle Robbing ass in the closet.

Originally released in 2003, then getting re-released in 2006 in the US, "Colour The Small One" is enjoying its rebirth. After getting lucky enough to have her song "Breathe Me" serve as the show "Six Feet Under"'s swan song, Sia has shown that she is more than just a one-hit wonder. Her soft brand of sugary sweetness is causing diabetic shock throughout the music industry. She has been hailed by some as neck and neck with Amy Winehouse as the next big thing. Picture Bjork, Kate Bush, and Tori Amos having a threesome... huh? Sorry...uh... where was I... Oh, yeah, the girl can sing. And she can write as well. Intricately woven lyrics mixed with her unique vocal patterns, the Australian cutie keeps you grooving with a brand of upbeat, jazz influenced loveliness.

Now, you KNOW I couldn't have a top ten album list without throwing my boys into the mix. Another 2006 release, I've been running this album, one of their most ambitious efforts so far. "Game Theory" treats us to tracks like the skateboard indie-like "Livin' In the New World", or the soulful "Baby" and show why the "one and only hip hop band" have transcended hip hop and remain a trailblazing super-group. FYI, last Saturday I had the privilege of hanging out with the guitarist "Capt'n" Kirk Douglas, after bumping into him at a party, and he told me that their next release, slated for an early 2008 jump-off, will be the band's most experimental effort to date. Hard to believe given their track record. I'll be waiting.

So there it goes. I hope to see everyone else's list whenever you get the chance to list them. Until then, happy new year, and let's hope 2008 raises the bar in the music industry and gives us more to debate about. Peace.

Your Resident Music Slut,

Dre.

Friday, October 19, 2007

A Step up from Monkeys

This is one of the most painful problems facing Blacks around the world. The sad thing is I bet others of intellect and prominences feel this way but choose not to express it. I don't care about Don Imus, David Duke, John Wayne rednecks who barely live above the poverty line themselves. This I care about. I hate how a few white people justify their world dominance by demeaning our humanity, and make no mistake: to demean our intelligence is to demean our humanity.

Fury at DNA pioneer's theory: Africans are less intelligent than Westerners
Celebrated scientist attacked for race comments: "All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really"
By Cahal Milmo
Published: 17 October 2007

One of the world's most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that "equal powers of reason" were shared across racial groups was a delusion.

James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America's leading scientific research institutions, drew widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in London.

The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when "testing" suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.

The newly formed Equality and Human Rights Commission, successor to the Commission for Racial Equality, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks " in full". Dr Watson told The Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true".

His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he writes: "There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so."

The furore echoes the controversy created in the 1990s by The Bell Curve, a book co-authored by the American political scientist Charles Murray, which suggested differences in IQ were genetic and discussed the implications of a racial divide in intelligence. The work was heavily criticised across the world, in particular by leading scientists who described it as a work of " scientific racism".

Dr Watson arrives in Britain today for a speaking tour to publicise his latest book, Avoid Boring People: Lessons from a Life in Science. Among his first engagements is a speech to an audience at the Science Museum organised by the Dana Centre, which held a discussion last night on the history of scientific racism.

Critics of Dr Watson said there should be a robust response to his views across the spheres of politics and science. Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: "It is sad to see a scientist of such achievement making such baseless, unscientific and extremely offensive comments. I am sure the scientific community will roundly reject what appear to be Dr Watson's personal prejudices.

"These comments serve as a reminder of the attitudes which can still exists at the highest professional levels."

The American scientist earned a place in the history of great scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century when he worked at the University of Cambridge in the 1950s and 1960s and formed part of the team which discovered the structure of DNA. He shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for medicine with his British colleague Francis Crick and New Zealand-born Maurice Wilkins.

But despite serving for 50 years as a director of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, considered a world leader in research into cancer and genetics, Dr Watson has frequently courted controversy with some of his views on politics, sexuality and race. The respected journal Science wrote in 1990: "To many in the scientific community, Watson has long been something of a wild man, and his colleagues tend to hold their collective breath whenever he veers from the script."

In 1997, he told a British newspaper that a woman should have the right to abort her unborn child if tests could determine it would be homosexual. He later insisted he was talking about a "hypothetical" choice which could never be applied. He has also suggested a link between skin colour and sex drive, positing the theory that black people have higher libidos, and argued in favour of genetic screening and engineering on the basis that " stupidity" could one day be cured. He has claimed that beauty could be genetically manufactured, saying: "People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think it would great."

The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory said yesterday that Dr Watson could not be contacted to comment on his remarks.

Steven Rose, a professor of biological sciences at the Open University and a founder member of the Society for Social Responsibility in Science, said: " This is Watson at his most scandalous. He has said similar things about women before but I have never heard him get into this racist terrain. If he knew the literature in the subject he would know he was out of his depth scientifically, quite apart from socially and politically."

Anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson's remarks to be looked at in the context of racial hatred laws. A spokesman for the 1990 Trust, a black human rights group, said: "It is astonishing that a man of such distinction should make comments that seem to perpetuate racism in this way. It amounts to fuelling bigotry and we would like it to be looked at for grounds of legal complaint."

What do you guys think about this article?

Guys,

This is courtesy of Ed. He didn't give me his opinion of it yet, i'm glad he's saving it, so what is yours?

NFL truth: Hip-hop culture hurting NFL
Jason Whitlock / FOXSports.com
Posted: 1 hour ago

You get one NFL Truth today. Watching Chad Johnson and Larry Johnson undermine their respective head coaches, Marvin Lewis and Herm Edwards, on Sunday gave me a singular focus, forced me to contemplate an uncomfortable truth.
African-American football players caught up in the rebellion and buffoonery of hip hop culture have given NFL owners and coaches a justifiable reason to whiten their rosters. That will be the legacy left by Chad, Larry and Tank Johnson, Pacman Jones, Terrell Owens, Michael Vick and all the other football bojanglers.
In terms of opportunity for American-born black athletes, they're going to leave the game in far worse shape than they found it.

It's already starting to happen. A little-publicized fact is that the Colts and the Patriots — the league's model franchises — are two of the whitest teams in the NFL. If you count rookie receiver Anthony Gonzalez, the Colts opened the season with an NFL-high 24 white players on their 53-man roster. Toss in linebacker Naivote Taulawakeiaho "Freddie" Keiaho and 47 percent of Tony Dungy's defending Super Bowl-champion roster is non-African-American. Bill Belichick's Patriots are nearly as white, boasting a 23-man non-African-American roster, counting linebacker Tiaina "Junior" Seau and backup quarterback Matt Gutierrez.


For some reason, these facts are being ignored by the mainstream media. Could you imagine what would be written and discussed by the media if the Yankees and the Red Sox were chasing World Series titles with 11 African-Americans on their 25-man rosters (45 percent)?

We would be inundated with information and analysis on the social significance. Well, trust me, what is happening with the roster of the Patriots and the Colts and with Roger Goodell's disciplinary crackdown are all socially significant.

Hip hop athletes are being rejected because they're not good for business and, most important, because they don't contribute to a consistent winning environment. Herm Edwards said it best: You play to win the game.

I'm sure when we look up 10 years from now and 50 percent — rather than 70 percent — of NFL rosters are African-American, some Al Sharpton wannabe is going to blame the decline on a white-racist plot.

That bogus charge will ignore our role in our football demise. We are in the process of mishandling the opportunity and freedom earned for us by Jim Brown, Walter Payton, Doug Williams, Mike Singletary, Gale Sayers, Willie Lanier and countless others. And those of us in the media who have rationalized, minimized and racialized every misstep by Vick, Pacman and T.O. have played an equal role in blowing it.


By failing to confront and annihilate the abhorrent cultural norms we have allowed to grab our youth, we have in the grand American scheme sentenced many of them to hell on earth (incarceration), and in the sports/entertainment world we've left them to define us as unreliable, selfish and buffoonish.

I take you to Arrowhead Stadium this past Sunday when two competent and respected black head coaches led the Chiefs and the Bengals in battle, and their efforts were periodically sabotaged by Chad and Larry Johnson, the two players Lewis and Edwards have defended the most.

Football fans are aware of Lewis' love affair with Chad Johnson, the Flavor Flav of the gridiron. Johnson's insistence on conducting a minstrel show during games has long been reluctantly tolerated by Lewis. Johnson, I guess, is just too talented, productive and well-compensated for Lewis to discipline. So Lewis has chosen to enable, going as far as making excuses when Johnson's selfish behavior extended to an alleged locker-room shoving match with coaches (including a swing at Lewis) at halftime of the Bengals' Jan. 8, 2006 playoff loss to the Steelers.

Coming off an 11-5 regular season and having been crowned the toast of Cincinnati, Lewis responded to that Johnson meltdown by vowing to cut the player who leaked the fight information to the media.

Since then, the Bengals have been one of the league's biggest disappointments, finishing 8-8 last season and starting 1-4 this season. Injuries have played a significant role in Cincy's troubles, but so has a lack of on- and off-field discipline and focus. Lewis' coddling of Chad Johnson has destroyed the chemistry that made the Bengals a playoff team in 2005.

On Sunday, with the Bengals trying to rally out of a two-score deficit, Johnson failed to finish a pass route, which contributed to Carson Palmer throwing an interception.

Not to be outdone, Larry Johnson continued his season-long pattern of immature behavior, spiking the football in frustration with 4 minutes to play and the Chiefs attempting to run out the clock. The Bengals were out of timeouts and the spike stopped the clock, giving Cincy one last chance to make a comeback.


Johnson, despite receiving a new $45-million contract, has brooded, pouted and complained all season. He spent the off-season promising to be a leader and has spent the first six weeks of the season spreading locker-room cancer. Edwards-coached teams have traditionally been the least-penalized squads in the NFL. This year's Chiefs are one of the most-penalized squads. Nickel back Benny Sapp drew an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Sunday, had to be dragged off the field by Donnie Edwards, and was spotted on the sideline arguing with players and coaches.

Race is not the determining factor when it comes to having a good or bad attitude. Culture is.

Hip hop is the dominant culture for black youth. In general, music, especially hip hop music, is rebellious for no good reason other than to make money. Rappers and rockers are not trying to fix problems. They create problems for attention.

That philosophy, attitude and behavior go against everything football coaches stand for. They're in a constant battle to squash rebellion, dissent and second opinions from their players.

You know why Muhammad Ali is/was an icon? Because he rebelled against something meaningful and because he excelled in an individual sport. His rebellion didn't interfere with winning. Jim Brown, Bill Russell, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, etc. rebelled with dignity and purpose.

What we're witnessing today are purposeless, selfish acts of buffoonery. Sensible people have grown tired of it. Football people are recognizing it doesn't contribute to a winning environment.

Whether calculated or not, the Patriots and the Colts have created settings in which Brady and Manning can lead and feel comfortable. I remember back in the 1980s when some black sports fans accused the Celtics of being racist for having a predominantly-white roster when Larry Bird was the star. No one remembered that Red Auerbach occasionally fielded an all-black starting lineup during Bill Russell's heyday.

My point is that it makes sense to cater to your stars. And it makes even more sense to fill your roster with players who don't mind being led, even if you sacrifice a little 40-yard dash speed.

If things don't change quickly, we're going to learn this lesson the hard way.

Friday, October 5, 2007

What the hell happened Yankees?

So I was about to jump off the roof when...

Ok, it wasn't that bad. Ok, it WAS that bad. Game 1 went about as bad as it could go. Wang got bombed and the offense let Sabathia off the hook last night when they had him in trouble in the first. Pettite is going tonight and I would bet money (Zac?) that he will pitch very well tonight and the Yankees will tie it up at one game a piece.

The thing that upset me is that Wang threw too many breaking pitches. It's like Ed has said so many times, you don't want to change what got you there. There being the playoffs and winning 19 games. The guy throws 94 mph sinkers and makes you hit it into the ground. Why change that? Supposedly the Indians are a good fastball hitting team. So what? It seemed like every hard hit ball off Wang - and yes there were plenty - were off breaking balls last night. That's not his strength. Bad gameplan. As for Sabathia, the guy is throwing harder than ever. He looked good when he wasn't missing the strike zone.

The big worries for me are Clemens going in game 3 now. The guy hasn't pitched in 3 weeks. I'm very worried. I wouldn't have been as worried had Wang won. You could almost experiment with Clemens going in Game 3, but now? I would rather see Hughes or Ian Kennedy. 5 Game series' are tough. Since the Indians are such a good fastball hitting team we're definitely going to win Mussina's start. The guy hasn't thrown a fastball in 2 years.

Monday, October 1, 2007

The Mets: Where do they go from here?

Met fans, I am truly sorry for the way the season ended for you. Honestly. I did not take any delight in your sorrow this weekend, which I know must be considerable. As a Yankee fan, I know about collapses. I heard a lot about it from you all after the Yanks were beaten by the Sawx taking four straight from the Yanks after being down 3-0. That being said, the Mets are fixable. They have the resources to do it. This season may end up being kind of good for the Mets. I stated last season that this team hadn't faced adversity which was why I wasn't sure about them reachign the Series last year. This year, they finally faced adversity, and while they didn't pass this test, at least now they faced it. They can learn from this. I don't think that this is the way they're doomed to face adversity their whole careers. I do think it was troubling the way that Reyes played over the last 6 weeks of the season, but I don't think it's something we should come to expect from him on a year-in, year-out basis.

I stated from the beginning of the year that it was short-sighted and irresponsible of the Mets to have such old players at key positions when you have aspirations of winning it all. If they weren't expected to make a serious run at the World Series, then going into the season depending on: El Duque (41 and injury prone), Glavine(41), Jose Valentin(37, coming off a career year), Moises Alou (41 and injury prone)and Shawn Green(34 and injury prone). Maybe the thought process was that with 2 injury prone, older, corner outfielders that Lastings Milledge would get the opportunity to play, but thats asking for too much to go right if you have championship aspirations. Then there is the case of Paul LoDuca. I like him for the most part. He is good defensively and calls a relatively good game. He was another Met that had a career year last year that could not be called on to perform as well as he did. He will be 35 next year and as long as his contract is not too large, he should be re-signed as a stop gap until another catcher comes along. Word is that the Mets will be making a big play for Posada this off season. Getting Posada would be huge for the Mets, but they would probably have to overpay for him to come to Shea.

I'm not sure what outfielders are going to be free agents this coming off season, but the time is probably now for them to trade Lastings Milledge to acquire a young starter. Maybe the Mets should start talks with Billy Beane who seems to love Milledge and get Danny Haren who may obtainable now that Haren is - I think - arbitration eligible. Beane is notorious for trading guys away at this stage in their careers. It is easier and cheaper to get corner outfileders with some power than it is to get starting pitching. If you pick up a decent - not injury prone - outfielder this off-season, give Endy Chavez/Ramon Castro about 300-400 AB's next year for his speed and defense, I think they'll be all right.

What I find troubling is that Wagner is trying to blame Randolph and Rick Peterson for how bad they pitched over the last month or 2. Were they overworked? Sure. But that had more to do with the fact that their starters couldn't go longer in games. They really missed one of Izzy's favorites in Darren Oliver. He could go - as Iz pointed out - up to 4 innings by himself. They really missed him for his ability to eat innings in the middle of games. Plus, they still haven't found a replacement for Duaner Sanchez. He's starting to become the Mets' version of Carl Pavano. Getting Sanchez back should be a huge boost for the Mets next season. I don't think that the Mets' bullpen will need an overhaul. If they are able to obtain a couple of innings eaters, they should be fine. Unfortunately, thats easier said than done. Maybe they can go for Dontrelle Willis. They'll most likely be able to get him on the cheap and if Willis gets to a team with a chance to win, maybe he'll pitch better. The only other question with him is his weird delivery which may put a lot of stress on his elbow which should worry you if you want him for the long haul.

What do you guys think? Any ideas on what went wrong and how to fix it?

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Great article. Sorry, more about Vick, but it's good stuff. Promise.

It's getting harder for me to write as much from home as before, so in the spirit of Slackertown USA, I'm posting this article by Howard Bryant of ESPN.com Again, its on Vick, but It's a great piece that I thought most of you would enjoy. I'm also including the link to the piece so ESPN can get some more hits, not that they need anymore.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=bryant_howard&id=3035358


Vick case has us confounded by the race issue again
Bryant


By Howard Bryant
ESPN.com
(Archive)



The letters sit heavy for weeks. They do not yellow, for in the paperless society people do not write the way they once did. They use e-mail, and it is now impossible not to be aware of the exact number of people who want to talk to you about him: from 255, when the federal government closed in on Michael Vick, to 974 later when it became clear he would plead guilty, to 2,208 on Sept. 20. That many from his first comments 'til today, 11 weeks of fresh air left before his Dec. 10 sentencing.

Michael Vick

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Michael Vick's case has come to represent more to America than a simple dogfighting arrest.
The letters are overwhelmingly from Americans, your countrymen and women, and you theirs, all of us blanketed in a word -- American -- that should say something more about us than merely location. A word that should provide a crucial, binding commonality, especially at a time when two wars are being fought.

Ostensibly, the letters are about Vick, about what he did and what he did not do. But they are really about us. Go beyond Vick. He doesn't matter anymore. They are about the intractability of race. They reveal the faces behind the American mask, the black and the white at stubborn impasse. Vick has provided us an unwelcome mirror, shown us who we are when we're held up close to the light, what we are really thinking when we walk past each other every day, each wearing the same uniform that says "America" across the chest. The uniform is the same, but clearly, after he exposed the raw nerves of race and class and privilege, Vick has shown us we are not all playing on the same team. We've always known this. But maybe we thought that by living better than our parents, at a greater distance from the bloody collisions that pockmarked their lives, we had made progress.

Vick shattered that illusion, telling us that despite undeniable progress in rights and opportunities, we don't understand each other at all.

The letters are there, so you tell yourself to go ahead, click on them, all of them, which have landed here over the past month. You don't flinch. You tell yourself to put them out there, as Malcolm X once said, "In a language we can all understand."

And then you deal with it.

Commonality

"Just maybe people will stop crying 'race' and understand right and wrong for a change -- when the ref fixed games the white people didn't say 'please understand where he came from or it's the culture.' It was wrong, black or white! I'm so sick that African-Americans can't separate right and wrong -- blame the white man or use their 'culture' as excuse -- like having babies and leaving (70%), not wanting to do well in school for that's 'being white,' not wanting to speak proper English, just wanting to be known for being dancers and athletes, and for calling women 'bad' names and using such foul language in their common talk. We're not animals and people know right from wrong."
-- A reader's e-mail

The Michael Vick Divide

At 6 p.m., ET, on Tuesday, ESPN will air a SportsCenter Town Hall Meeting Special in Atlanta to discuss the role of race in the Michael Vick case. Called "The Michael Vick Divide," the special features a panel that includes Terance Mathis, a former Atlanta Falcon and teammate of Vick; Atlanta Journal-Constitution sports columnist Terence Moore; former Falcon Chuck Smith; and New York Times sports columnist Selena Roberts, among others.

The Town Hall Meeting will be moderated by ESPN's Bob Ley.
Perhaps we don't care to go this deep, into the real space of communication, preferring instead surprise every time an O.J. Simpson moment tells us more about ourselves than it ever could about something as simple as a double murder. We expected, as a people, to be universal in our outrage that two people were killed. We were wrong; and when race took a hand, it all unraveled and we ended up here, running in place. Maybe it is the words, words like "justice" and "equality," that get in the way. They are clumsy words designed to fool us into thinking we live under the same umbrella. We don't. We are not the same. We are not equals. We do not begin at the same starting line. We accept this fact in virtually every other facet of our lives.

Michael Vick

Robin Snyder/Scoopt/Getty Images

Middle ground on the Vick case appears to be non-existent.
It's been hammered into our skulls that life isn't fair. Your little brother is taller than you. The boss' son has an edge on you. You went to a state school, and you're competing against kids who went to Harvard. Life isn't fair. We all understand, except when it comes to race. Only with race do we demand the myth that the scales are equaled, that everything we've done, everything we've been, has now become wonderfully balanced. When the myth of equality is disturbed, we recoil and then uncoil. Even when simple, obvious observations about life being unfair are raised -- black quarterbacks are judged differently than white ones -- intelligence immediately takes a holiday.

"Are African-Americans ever at fault for anything? Repression is over, debts for slavery is over. I cannot believe that people pay you for your racist BS. Vick did wrong, and he has to pay the penalty, just like anyone else would and should pay. Who cares what color he is? Don't play the race card because he … cannot make the correct decisions."
-- A reader's e-mail

Try to see what black people see. Stand on the platform at 59th Street in Manhattan and wait for the D train to the Bronx. Look at the Asian teenager, the one with the ubiquitous white iPod earbuds, clutching a bag of McDonald's in one hand and a hot coffee in the other. Look at the white father and son, probably heading to the Yankees game. Look at the black kids bunched near the stairwell, wearing their Yankees caps, and at three Latinas banging out too-fast-for-my-level Spanish as the A train -- the wrong train if you're going to Yankee Stadium -- approaches. That is New York City on Sunday morning, Sept. 23, 2007.

Then turn on television and watch "Friends," one of the highest-rated shows in TV history, and look at the New York being beamed out to the world from your country. It is a New York you've never seen, one so carefully devoid of the color that gives New York its special vibrancy, makes it unlike any city on Earth, and ask yourself how this is possible. Scrubbing New York so clean of its diversity, of its authenticity, does not feel like an accident. Ask yourself who made the decision to make your New York, the one you lived in and breathed, look like this? Yes, it's just a television show, but it's also a fact: The people being wiped out of the picture look just like you.

O.J. Simpson

Jae C. Hong/AP Photo

O.J. Simpson's double-murder trial brought race to a boiling point in American consciousness, and his recent arrest stoked those fires again.
Think about language, the term "the race card," and feel the sting of being slapped right in the face. The sum of another person's life experience can be reduced by your countrymen to nothing more than a tactic needed to win a game, the strategic equivalent of calling a fake punt when the time is right. To them, the life you've lived is nothing but a cheap gimmick, the desperation play in times of emergency.

Go back to a 1997 Vanity Fair essay on race by Fran Leibowitz:

"The way to approach it, I think, is not to ask, 'What would it be like to be black?' but to seriously consider what it is like to be white. That's something white people almost never think about. And what it is like to be white is not to say, 'We have to level the playing field,' but to acknowledge that not only do white people own the playing field, but they have so designated this plot of land as a playing field to begin with. White people are the playing field. The advantage of being white is so extreme, so overwhelming, so immense that to use the word 'advantage' at all is misleading since it implies a kind of parity that doesn't exist."

That's not a cop-out. It is not playing "victim" or the dreaded "race card." It is simply a fact. And we all have to live, and love and thrive in spite of it. And so many of us do.

"I was confounded to hear your apologist take on Vick on National Public Radio Aug. 25, confounded until I saw your picture on the ESPN Web site. Clearly, your blackness makes you unable to understand the deep pain this monster has caused people, such as myself, who consider their pet dogs a member of the family.

"This entire incident has caused me to question my lifelong pursuit to stamp out the latent racism taught to me by parents. Your comments make me sick, and caused me to view you as less than human.

"I suspect your blood runs as cold as his."
-- A reader's e-mail

Walk into Borders at Columbus Circle in Manhattan and think for a second about Cuba. People told me when I visited Havana that racial divisions there are as pronounced as they are here. They say light-skinned Cubans have more money and more political clout -- dark people dominate the island, but the light ones run the government.

But in Cuba, the music -- the son, the guajira -- brings people together. There is a national music that white and black Cubans play together. It is their bond.

Now go into the bookstore's music sections and see the many ways we are divided. Divided for ease, yes, but also divided for profit. In America, there is no simple commonality. Just ask the black kids who listened to rock or alternative or any other type of "white music." They paid a price, just as clearly as the whites who idolized hip-hop culture did when their peers -- at least where I grew up in Massachusetts -- would ask them why they listened to "jungle music." Their peers, black and white, made sure everyone stayed in their lanes.

Now go back to the television section, where there are white comedies and black comedies, with only the cash register in the middle. It is there, in the checkout line, not in the church or at the dinner table, where we all finally meet.

Michael Vick

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Is race an element in the reaction to Vick's court case? Of course it is.
You look at your country like this and you see that the reaction to Vick is a continuation of the divisions America has mastered. It makes sense, then, that something so seemingly simple as being offended that a person electrocuted an animal could become so complicated.

Malcolm X, another divider who learned to heal -- tragically, too late -- once said, "Show me a capitalist and I'll show you a racist." His reasoning: Eventually, at some level for all people, and corporations especially, the pursuit of revenue will ultimately collide with what's good for the whole. Ask Michael Jordan, the shoe king of the third world, or Phil Knight at Nike. They got rich together.

Justice

"If Vick was white, nothing would be done. What happened to Wayne Gretzky and his wife gambling and betting on hockey games? Go and get some information about that. So when you come to work tomorrow you wouldn't even have a job. You're not permitted to talk trash about the white people, but you can about Mr. Vick."
-- A reader's e-mail

Forget, if you can, the idea of equality. Like objectivity in journalism, it doesn't exist. The world is too big, individual experiences too sharp and unique, for common experience to belong to everyone. We didn't all have the same starting points, but we want to believe in that far-away ideal -- and justice for all -- because it is all we have. But accepting that ideal for what it is -- a goal, and not a standard -- might make it easier to talk.

Think about what it means to look the part, and you realize how hard it is to turn off the impulse. Barry Bonds needs to go away, for good. He is reprehensible, yes. But he is no more suspicious than Troy Glaus or Rick Ankiel, and you cannot compare the recent coverage of their stories to Bonds by reducing the issue to a discussion of Bonds' outsized stature against their relatively small celebrity. Ankiel looks his part, the feel-good part, and Bonds his.

In 1991, I exited a New Jersey transit bus in the suburban hamlet of Gibbstown in broad daylight, wearing a Temple University sweatshirt and sporting a yellow Sony Sports Walkman. Two police officers, hands on their weapons, appeared and ordered me to the ground.

"Where are you going?" they asked.

"To my aunt's house. She lives down the street."

"Where did you come from?"

"I just got off the bus. I'm a student at Temple."

"Well, we saw the bus go by, but didn't see you get off of it. We're looking for a guy who looks just like you. Armed robbery."

The police act like this. I know, because it happened to me. I looked the part. There is no equality, unless you, too, have been the guy with his cheekbone in the asphalt with a gun on you.

But once, you were, because that's what people on top do to people on the bottom. "Irish Need Not Apply." Grab a history book and read about how the immigrant Irish and Italians were treated by the police. Why do you think they call them "Paddy wagons"?

Maybe we have more in common than we think.

We said we wanted to hear from Vick. We demanded contrition. He had to feel horrible about what he did. The only human thing to do was show remorse. And then one August day, he spoke. The analysts talked about the victory for the justice department, the guilty plea gained so swiftly, so efficiently. It was a great day for justice.

Alberto Gonzales

Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images

Why is it that the public hasn't demanded an apology from Alberto Gonzales, as it did from Vick?
On that same day, with all eyes on Vick, the country's No. 1 law enforcement official quietly resigned in disgrace without nearly the demand for contrition. Alberto Gonzales, the U.S. attorney general, abruptly stepped away from his office while at the center of a congressional investigation.

At once, race stared us down again. The black face, forced to say he was sorry for what he did; Gonzales, allowed to disappear behind kind words about his dedication from the president, who called him a victim. The highest law in the land -- the federal justice system -- was being investigated by the body that makes the laws, and nobody seemed to care or question a justice department's being corrupted at the highest level. Maybe this is why black people believed with so much force that Vick was being held to a higher, unfair standard.

They saw race. What they didn't see quite as clearly was class. Gonzales could have been Mexican-American, white or Clarence Thomas. What mattered wasn't his race, but his class. Gonzales was part of the power, the people who have more ability to corrupt the umbrella ideal of justice than a thousand Michael Vicks -- who clearly transcended class financially, but never socially -- ever will. These are the people who make the rules. They have the power. And they never, ever, have to say they're sorry.

Revelation

"Uncle Howard has to sell bro Michael Vick in his article of betrayal; because the pea brain bigots at ESPN would have it no other way. Every one of their moronic media people has to compete to see who is best at the good ole American pastime, Black lynching. Nothing like a good old fashion Black lynching."
-- A reader's e-mail

Don't be depressed by the predictability of it all. Take it in, a deep corrosive drag off a smoke. In 2004, a black male sold $50 worth of crack cocaine to an undercover Boston police officer within 1,000 feet of a school. At his trial, I was made jury foreman. He was guilty, and I read the verdict.

My uncle was upset.

"I would have never convicted him," he said. "Why? Because of all the times they put us away for nothing. I'd never convict another black man. Never. Let him go. Leave it to someone else."

Vick belongs in prison for what he admitted to doing. The details, if you feel anything at all, do not need repeating. You look for commonality, and this was supposed to be an easy one. You break the law, you pay.

Michael Vick

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Have we learned anything yet from the Vick case? And if we have, can we apply it to the next incident?
And yet, the majority of African-Americans who wrote say Vick has been unfairly targeted, and also believe that African-Americans offended by his actions have lost the meaning of being black. They've just been co-opted by whites.

"Hey Howard, go back to your white girlfriend and your white neighborhood with your white bosses and all be white together. We don't need you. Black people don't care about this. They're just dogs. You care about them because your white bosses tell you to care."
-- A reader's e-mail

The baseline of common decency -- that people simply are not supposed to behave this way and there are basic concepts of behavior we can all agree upon -- has disintegrated. Or maybe it hasn't even arrived. The letters tell you this is so. The exchanges between you and the black people who say you have contributed to the destruction of another black male grow heated and depressing. The question about how someone who murdered an animal could become so much more about black-and-white is being answered right here, right now. And you think about money, that everyone with enough talent in the right discipline can earn $1 million.

But as with the ubiquitous Simpson, we cannot reach the human layer of commonality, because we believe it doesn't exist. Not while race first defines who has value and who does not, who receives sympathy and who does not, and who goes to jail and who does not.

Maybe, you suggest to the readers, that the reverse is true. Maybe it is Michael Vick who let everyone down. Get past the clumsy words. We know that things are harder for us, you say, so you ask why Vick put himself in this position. He was the winner of the Great American Lottery, in which his talent trumped the intractable racial and class divisions. You tell them about what he did and what his crimes mean to you as a person. You tell them that believing Vick should pay for his crime doesn't mean you believe Tim Donaghy shouldn't pay for his.

You think you are making progress, and then they respond. They tell you that you are nothing more than a tool for your white bosses.

"I am a 53-year-old black man who grew up during the '60s civil rights era, the Black Panthers, and the Nation of Islam here in Oakland, Calif. My friends have called me an 'Uncle Tom' because I don't have any sympathy for Vick. This case is NOT about race. It's about right or wrong. Period. I never thought that in a million years that I would make this statement."
-- A reader's e-mail

You think about your older sister, the one so acutely attuned to even the faintest scent of racism or sexism. She's the political one, the radical; and yet, she is also horrified by Vick, and more by the blind loyalty toward Vick in the black community.

"Why are black people spending so much time protecting him?" she asks one evening. "And all these [people] want to say he's a victim. A victim of what? And what about all the black people who believe this is wrong but don't want to get beat down by their own? And what about the black people who didn't mess up their lives and need help? Who speaks for them?"

Rules
When it happens again, when the next story hits us like a flash flood and we're asking, dumbfounded, how race again became so prominent, remember that Vick has already provided the answer: It always was. Go back to W.E.B. Du Bois and read the first paragraph: "The problem of the 20th Century is the problem of the color line, no longer in opportunities, perhaps, but certainly in thought."

Take the umbrella words -- equality, reality, justice -- and throw them in the trash. Umbrellas are useless, because here, it always rains sideways. One day, maybe we'll believe in truths that aren't our own. Start from a new place. Maybe then we'll have a fighting chance next time.

Howard Bryant is a Senior Writer for ESPN.com and ESPN the Magazine. He is the author of "Shut Out: A Story of Race and Baseball in Boston" and "Juicing the Game: Drugs, Power and the Fight for the Soul of Major League Baseball." He can be reached at Howard.Bryant@espn3.com.


KudoSurf Me!